Archive for November, 2006

Lecture 7. Green Localism

7. Green localism  

Green discourse 

Green economics 

Against growth 

Economics as alienation 

Zen and consumption

Bad trade 

Green Localism

 Green alternatives to globalisation Green economics as functionalism? Wall (2005) Ch 4.Woodin, M. and Lucas, C.  (2004) Green Alternative to Globalisation:  A Manifesto. London:  Pluto Press.    A few years ago I was eating at a St. Paul, Minnesota, restaurant.  After lunch, I picked up a toothpick wrapped in plastic.  On the plastic was printed the word Japan.  Japan has little wood and no oil; nevertheless, it has become efficient enough in our global economy to bring little pieces of wood and barrels of oil to Japan, to wrap the one in the other, and send the manufactured product to Minnesota.  This toothpick may have travelled 50,000 miles.  But never fear, we are now retaliating in kind.  A Hibbing, Minnesota, factory now produces one billion disposable chopsticks a year for sale in Japan.  In my mind’s eye, I see two ships passing one another in the northern Pacific.  One carries little pieces of Minnesota wood bound for Japan; the other carries little pieces of Japanese wood bound for Minnesota.  Such is the logic of free trade. (Morris 1996: 222) The more people consume, the better it is.  Its not so much a question of consumer durables as of durable consumers.  […] Consumption becomes an end in itself.  Even when the market reaches saturation, the process doesnt stop; for the only way to beat a glut is to turn everybody into gluttons. (Porritt 1984: 47)         

Seminar questions

1. what is green economics?

2. Why are greens ‘localists’?

3. Why do greens criticise ‘accumulation’?

  Morris, D.  (1996) Free Trade:  The Great Destroyer,  Mander, J. and Goldsmith, E.  (eds.) (1996) The Case Against the  Global Economy:  and for a turn towards the local.  San Fransisco:  Sierra Club.
Wall (2005) Ch 4.
Woodin, M. and Lucas, C.  (2004) Green Alternative to Globalisation:  A Manifesto.  London:  Pluto Press.

Useful Links

 www.greeneconomics.org.uk/www.psr.keele.ac.uk/area/uk/e01/man/green/2001/manifesto/gpm01-just_economics.htm

http://www.leftbusinessobserver.com/Globalization.html  A critique of green economics from the left.

Leave a Comment

Lecture 6. Development as Freedom

‘the pro-market people […] don’t take the market sufficiently seriously, because if they did they would make it easier for people to enter the market. For that you often need state action, through land reform, microcredit, education and basic health care. These are very important areas for state action which make the market economy itself more efficient and more equitable.http://www.indiatogether.org/interviews/sen.htm “He’s peculiarly shy about talking politics publicly. It’s a kind of self-denial,” says Meghnad Desai, director of the centre for the study of global governance at the LSE. “It’s also a generational thing. Good economists, when he started out, didn’t get into politics. So he prefers to be subversive in a technical way.”http://www.guardian.co.uk/saturday_review/story/0,3605,465796,00.html Amartya Sen

A gentle liberal or an alternative economist? 

 Freedom as goal  

Capacity 

Freedom as an aid to growth

  

Democracy and Famine  

Women and Development

 Environmental accounting  

Ambiguity 

Failure to deal with enclosure.    

Further Reading


Sen, A.  (1999) Development as Freedom.  Oxford:  Oxford University Press.
Seminar Questions

1. Why does Sen argue that ‘development is freedom’?

2. How does Sen criticise classical economics?

3. Can Sen be termed an alternative economist? 

Useful Links

http://www.proxsa.org/resources/ghadar/v4n1/sen.htm  Marxist critique

www.guardian.co.uk/saturday_review/story/0,3605,465796,00.html 

Leave a Comment

Lecture 5. No Logo and beyond

In 1998 Coca Cola ran a competition for schools to design a marketing plan for their product, one school, Greenbriar High School, Evans, Georgia, suspended a nineteen year old student for wearing a Pepsi t-shirt to the official Coke day celebrations (Klein 2000: 95).   Hector Liang, ex-chair of United Biscuits observed, ‘Machines wear out.  Cars rust. People die.  But what lives on are brands’ (Klein 2001: 196). In 1993, a Sri Lankan zone worker by the name of Ranjith Mudiyanselage was killed […] [after] complaining about a faulty machine that had sliced off a co-worker’s finger, Mudiyanselage was abducted on his way out of an inquiry into the incident.  His body was found beaten and burning on a pile of old tires outside a local church.  The man’s legal advisor, who had accompanied him to the inquiry, was murdered in the same way. (Klein 2001: 214-15)      

 Lecture five looks at Naomi Klein’s critique of globalised capitalism, noting that she injects a cultural note, examines the importance of brands and moves on to practical alternatives in her film The Take.Here are a list of discussion headings for the lecture.

Naomi Klein Social Dumping  

Free Trade Zones  

‘Insourcing’  

No Logo  

The Take (2004)  

Commons  

Cultural politics and production  

Seminar questions

1. What is the central thesis of ‘No Logo’?

2. How does Klein draw  on cultural critiques of capitalism?

3. Discuss the importance of social dumping and outsourcing?

4. How convincing are Klein’s economic alternatives to capitalism?  

Further Reading.

Klein, N. (2000) No Logo, London: Harper Collins
Mertes,T. (2000) On No Logo ( review) New Left Review , July-August 2000, pp. 168–72
Wall (2005) Ch 3.

http://www.nologo.org

Leave a Comment